Date28 May 1794TypeCondescendenceCaseArbutnott, et al. v. Scott, et al.Length4 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 10MarginaliaYes Abstract AI-generated May 28, 1794 Memorial of the defenders, arguing that the check-dike is necessary for mill operation and any alteration would injure their rights. View larger map →← Arbutnott, et al. v. Scott, et al. — Condescendence, 23 May 17944 of 7 in this caseJohn Viscount of Arbuthnott and others v. James Scott of Brotherton and Charles Fullerton of Kinnaber — Answers, 5 Jun 1794 →SubjectsPossession✳Salmon Fishing✳Res judicata✳Places mentionedArbuthnott✳Kinnaber✳