1792–1793
Feu dutiesTeindsStipendTackHeritorFeuSir Thomas Dundas petitioned the Court to alter an interlocutor that had ordered the allocation of teind-duties before those to which heritors held heritable rights. Robert Baikie of Tankerness and other heritors of the United Parishes of St Andrews and Deerness answered the petition.AI-generated
Documents in this case (4)
- Dundas v. Baikie and others — Petition, 20 Nov 1792 [2]November 20, 1792 Petition of the petitioner asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor, which had ordered allocation of teind-duties before those to which heritors have heritable rights
- Dundas v. Baikie and others — Petition, 20 Nov 1792November 20, 1792 Petition of Sir Thomas Dundas asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
- Sir Thomas Dundas v. Robert Baikie — Answers, 8 Jan 1793 [2]January 8, 1793 Information of defenders, arguing that teind-duties paid to Sir Thomas Dundas in the parish of St Andrews and Deerness are to be allocated according to established rules of law and practice.
- Sir Thomas Dundas v. Robert Baikie — Answers, 8 Jan 1793January 8, 1793 Answers by Robert Baikie, Esq; of Tankerness, and others, Heritors of the United Parishes of St Andrews and Deerness, to the petition of Sir Thomas Dundas, Baronet.
People & places in this case
People involved
- Robert Baikie, of Tankerness — Party
- John Campbell, Lord Stonefield — Lord Ordinary
- Sir James Mackenzie, of Royston, Lord Royston — Lord Ordinary
