1792–1793
CreditorDebtProofArrestmentReductionBill of ExchangeAndrew Mackenzie petitioned the Court to alter the Lord Ordinary's interlocutor requiring him to produce title-deeds before receiving payment of his account. The creditors of Newlands answered that Mackenzie ought to be paid without producing the writings.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Mackenzie — Petition, 22 Nov 1792November 22, 1792 Petition of Andrew Mackenzie, Writer to the Signet, asking the Court to alter the Lord Ordinary's interlocutor that compelled him to produce title-deeds before payment of his account
- Andrew Mackenzie v. The Creditors of Lieutenant John Newlands — Answers, 15 Jan 1793January 15, 1793 Answers by the creditors of John Peat, Agent, S. Clerk to the argument of Lieutenant John Newlands, that Mr Mackenzie must be paid his account without producing the writings called for.
People & places in this case
People involved
- John Newlands, of Lochhead — Party
- William Keith — Party
- John Stenhouse — Party
- John McCall, of Belvidere — Party
- Charles Hay, of Newton, Lord Newton — Advocate for Party
- Charles Hope, Lord Granton — Advocate for Party
- William Tait — Advocate for Party
- Alexander Abercromby, Lord Abercromby — Lord Ordinary
- John Swinton, Lord Swinton — Lord Ordinary
- Allan Maconochie, Lord Meadowbank — Named in case documents
- Lieutenant-General John Sutherland — Named in case documents
