1792
ArrestmentSequestrationHypothecRoupPossessionRentGrinlay and others petitioned the court to revise Lord Gardenstone’s interlocutor, arguing that as bona fide purchasers at public sale they were not liable for furniture from Mrs. Campbell and that the sheriff’s rent preference was improper. Based on the single document cataloged for this case.
Documents in this case (1)
- Grinlay &c v. Lord Gardenstone's Interlocutor — Petition, 9 Mar 1792March 9, 1792: Petitioners seek court to revise interlocutor, arguing as bona fide purchasers at public sale, they’re not liable for furniture from Mrs. Campbell, and sheriff’s rent preference is improper.
People & places in this case
People involved
- George Dick — Party
- William Baird — Party
- William Law, Esq., of Elvingston — Party
- Robert Paterson — Party
- James Cheap — Party
- David Williamson Robertson Ewart, of Balgray — Advocate for Party
- Peter Mactaggart — Advocate for Party
Places
- Edinburgh (principal)
- Leith
- Linlithgow
- London
