This case involved a copartnery formed by members of the Alexander family and members of the Gordon family. The purpose of the copartnery was to manufacture dye using a method developed by George Gordon. After pursuing this business for a number of years, the Alexanders alleged that they had become substantial creditors of the copartnery. Accordingly, the Alexanders brought actions in Scottish court and eventually obtained a writ from the Court of King’s Bench in England. They also sought to dissolve the copartnery. In response, the Gordons raised an action for damages incurred as a result of the allegedly illegal proceedings instigated by the Alexanders; the Gordons also sought sums allegedly due to them in connection with the copartnery. As a result of this suit, the Gordons obtained an inhibition against the Alexanders. Robert and William Alexander petitioned the court to recall the inhibition, and later asked the court to sequester the assets of the copartnery.
Documents in this case (7)
- Robert — Petition, 24 Nov 1773November 24, 1773 Petition of William Alexander and his sons asking the Court to recall an inhibition against them raised by the Gordons
- Robert and William Alexander v. Cuthbert, James, and William Gordons — Answers, 2 Dec 1773December 2, 1773 Memorial of George and Cuthbert Gordon, arguing that Mess. Alexander and Sons are in breach of contract by refusing to pay for cudbear sold and by obstructing its market establishment.
People & places in this case
People involved
- Robert Alexander, of Boghall and Blackhouse — Pursuer
- William Alexander, of Blackhouse — Pursuer
- Cuthbert Gordon — Defender
- James Gordon — Defender
- William Gordon — Defender
- William Alexander, of Boghall and Blackhouse — Named in case documents
- George Gordon — Named in case documents
- Captain Henry Hooper — Named in case documents
- Ellis Martin and Co. — Named in case documents