Date5 Dec 1775TypeAnswersCaseRobertson and Husband v. HollandAuthorJames Grant, of CorrimonyLength8 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 03 Abstract AI-generated December 5, 1775 Answers by Mr William Holland to the petition of Martha Robertson, arguing that the bill and promissory note were obtained by fraud and without value. ← Robertson and Husband v. Holland — Petition, 21 Nov 17752 of 2 in this casePeople in this documentJames Grant, of CorrimonyWilliam HollandSubjectsDebtArrestmentBill of ExchangeFraudPromissory noteReductionSecurityCreditorPlaces mentionedSelkirkEdinburghMusselburghUniversity of Edinburgh