To fund an increased stipend for the minister of Leslie parish, Lord Glenlee prepared a “scheme of locality,” which allocated the stipend among the heritors liable to pay. During proceedings on the locality, Lord Glenlee found that John Melvill had failed to show that his lands at Prinlaws were held cum decimis inclusis, which would exempt them from liability for the stipend. Melvill challenged the interlocutor, and the court held that charters from the commendator of Inchcolm, dated 1550 and 1568, and confirmed by King James in 1584, rendered the lands exempt.
Documents in this case (3)
People involved
- John Melvill — Pursuer
- Jane Elizabeth Leslie, Countess of Rothes — Named in case documents
- Robert Carnegie — Named in case documents
- Robert Douglas, Colonel — Named in case documents
- Mr. Berry — Named in case documents
- Sir John Melvill, of Raith — Named in case documents
- David Melvill — Named in case documents
- Sir William Miller, Lord Glenlee, 2nd Baronet of Glenlee — Lord Ordinary
- H. Davidson, W.S. — Agent
- William Robertson, Lord Robertson — Advocate for Pursuer
- John Irving, W.S. — Defender
- David Douglas, of Reston — Advocate for Defender
Places
- Prinlaws (principal)
- Leslie (principal)
- Inchcolm Abbey
To fund an increased stipend for the minister of Leslie parish, Lord Glenlee prepared a “scheme of locality,” which allocated the stipend among the heritors liable to pay. During proceedings on the locality, Lord Glenlee found that John Melvill had failed to show that his lands at Prinlaws were held cum decimis inclusis, which would exempt them from liability for the stipend. Melvill challenged the interlocutor, and the court held that charters from the commendator of Inchcolm, dated 1550 and 1568, and confirmed by King James in 1584, rendered the lands exempt.
