1800
The defenders in this case, a group of soap and candle makers, purchased wicks from James Hutchison Jr. In turn, they sometimes sold their goods to Hutchison. Rather than paying separately for each transaction, the merchants periodically settled their accounts and paid the balance in cash or by bill. Unbeknownst to the defenders, Hutchison was selling the wicks on commission from pursuer William Baxter. When Hutchison died, Baxter sued the defenders for the price of certain wicks that they had received. However, the defenders argued that Hutchison owed them a larger sum, and that Baxter must bear the risk of misconduct by Hutchison, his consignee.
Documents in this case (2)
- William Baxter v. Bell and Maxwell and Others — petition, 22 May 1800May 22, 1800 Petition of William Baxter, Senior, Merchant in Dundee, asking the Court to alter Lord Craig's interlocutor
- William Baxter senior v. Bell & Maxwell, George and James Christie, Graham and Downie — answers, 27 Jun 1800June 27, 1800 Answers by Messrs Bell and Maxwell, George and James Christie, and Graham and Downie to the argument made by William Baxter senior, Merchant in Dundee, that the respondents are liable for goods sold by Hut…
People & places in this case
People involved
- William Baxter Sr. — Pursuer
- John Bell — Defender
- Gavin Maxwell — Defender
- George Christie — Defender
- James Christie — Defender
- Roger Graham — Defender
- John Downie — Defender
- Robert Craigie — Advocate for Pursuer
- Thomas Walker Baird — Advocate for Defender
- William Craig, Lord Craig — Lord Ordinary
- D. Freer, W.S. — Agent
- M. Clk. — Clerk
- M. Montgomerie — Agent
- James Hutchison Jr. — Named in case documents
- James Miller — Named in case documents
Published Reports
William Morison, The Decisions of the Court of Session (1811), pg. 5