1795
SuccessionCharterEntailTailzieInfeftmentAdjudicationThe Duke of Argyll, pursuer, argued against the Earl of Dunmore, defender, that he was entitled to reserve a year's rent from heirs of entail who were not heirs of line of the last investiture. Based on the single document cataloged for this case.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Argyll — Petition, 12 Feb 1795February 12, 1795 Memorial of the Duke of Argyll, arguing that he is entitled to reserve a year's rent from heirs of entail who are not heirs of line of the last investiture
- John Duke of Argyle v. John Earl of Dunmore — Answers, 9 Apr 1795April 9, 1795 Petition of the Earl of Dunmore against the interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary, which declared the Duke of Argyle not entitled to insert a reservation in the charter
People & places in this case
People involved
- David Williamson Robertson Ewart, of Balgray — Advocate for Party
Places
- Ross (principal)
- Carnwath
- Gairloch
- Argyll and Bute
- Argyle Street
Where this case took place
Published Reports
William Morison, The Decisions of the Court of Session (1811), pg. 15068
| The information regarding this case was derived from an import courteously provided by the Baillii Database of Scottish Court of Session Decisions. In terms of the SCOS project, this databases uses respective BAILII entries as metadata shells for case materials present in the SCOS project partners respective repositories. |
