1792–1793
LeaseTackInterlocutorInterdictRes judicataArrestmentFrancis Charteris, Earl of Wemyss, petitioned the Court to alter Lord Ankerville's interlocutor in his action against Sir Archibald Hope concerning coal rights in Woolmet and Hill. Hope answered, disputing Wemyss's arguments on the merits of the coal rights, and separately petitioned to alter the same interlocutor insofar as it repelled his objection of *res judicata*. The litigation thus involved competing petitions to alter the interlocutory judgment, presenting both substantive questions of mineral rights and procedural questions of claim preclusion.AI-generated
Documents in this case (3)
- Charteris — Petition, 20 Dec 1792December 20, 1792 Petition of Francis Charteris Earl of Wemyss, asking the Court to alter Lord Ankerville's interlocutor
- Earl of Wemyss v. Sir Archibald Hope — Answers, 15 Jan 1793January 15, 1793 Answers by Sir Archibald Hope to the petition of Earl of Wemyss, responding to arguments concerning coal rights in Woolmet and Hill
- Wemyss v. Hope — Petition, 1 Feb 1793February 1, 1793 Petition of Sir Archibald Hope asking the Court to alter Lord Ankerville's interlocutor which repels the objection of a res judicata
People & places in this case
People involved
- Sir Archibald Hope, of Pinkie, Bart. — Party
- William Tait — Advocate for Party
- Charles Hope, Lord Granton — Advocate for Party
- James Veitch, Lord Elliock — Lord Ordinary