1792–1793
DebtAlimentArrestmentSuccessionReductionCreditorDavid Anderson, merchant in Kirkaldy, petitioned to reduce a decree pronounced in an action of forthcoming. Martha Stewart answered, contending that Anderson had not been made a party to the original action and that the decree should not be reduced. Anderson subsequently petitioned the Court to alter its recent interlocutor.AI-generated
Documents in this case (3)
- Anderson — Petition, 9 Jul 1792July 9, 1792 Petition of David Anderson asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
- David Anderson v. Martha Stewart — answers, 5 Sep 1792September 5, 1792 Answers by Poor Mrs Martha Stewart to the petition of David Anderson, arguing that the petitioner was not made a party to the action of forthcoming and that the decree should not be reduced.
- Anderson — Petition, 19 Jun 1793June 19, 1793 Petition of David Anderson, merchant in Kirkaldy, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
