1788
SuspensionReductionCitationInterlocutorCautionExhibitionShiells, as petitioners, challenged Lord Dunfinnan’s interlocutor, arguing that a suspender could proceed as pursuer without awaiting the charger’s mora and that a late protestation could not invalidate prior steps. Based on the single document cataloged for this case.
Documents in this case (1)
- Shiells v. Lord Duncan's Interlocutor — Petition, 15 Jul 1788July 15, 1788: Petitioners challenge Lord Dunfinnan’s interlocutor, arguing a suspender may proceed as pursuer without waiting for charger’s mora, and that late protestation can’t invalidate prior steps.
People & places in this case
People involved
- Rev. William Shiells — Party
- James Breaden — Party
- Alexander Bayne — Party
