1774
DeviationPursuers Alexander and John Mackies obtained insurance for their ship, the Marshall of Gardenston, and its cargo. Although the ship was bound for Dundee, it docked at Down (now known as Macduff) during the voyage, and the cargo was stolen by a mob. The pursuers applied to the insurance underwriters for indemnification and eventually brought suit against them. However, the underwriters argued that they were not required to pay because the ship-master had deviated from the insured voyage by going to Down and taking on cargo there. Relevant documents are reproduced in an appendix to the defenders’ court filing.
Documents in this case (2)
- Alexander and John Mackies v. Alexander Houftoun, James Stuart, and other underwriters — Information, 1 Feb 1774February 1, 1774 Information of Alexander Houftoun, James Stuart, and other underwriters, arguing that a deviation from the voyage described in the policy absolves them from liability for loss at Down.
- Alexander and John Mackies v. Alexander Houston, James Stewart, and others underwriters — Information, 12 Feb 1774February 12, 1774 Information of Alexander and John Mackies, pursuers, arguing that the defenders are liable under the insurance policy for loss by theft and riot, despite alleged deviation from voyage route.
People & places in this case
People involved
- Alexander Mackies — Pursuer
- John Mackies — Pursuer
- Alexander Houston — Defender
- James Stuart — Defender
- Alexander Wight — Advocate for Defender
- James Ferguson, 3rd Laird of Pitfour — Advocate for Pursuer
- James Ferguson, 2nd Laird of Pitfour, Lord Pitfour — Lord Ordinary
- John Coutts and Company — Named in case documents
- Peter Gill — Named in case documents
- Archibald Trotter — Named in case documents
Places
- Macduff (principal)
- Gardenstown
- Fraserburgh
- Banff
- Dundee