LC Volume 07

Documents in this case (123)

• Revised Condescendence
• Mrs Mary Dun or Mason v. James Merry — Answers, 27 May 1828

  May 27, 1828 Defences of James Merry against Mrs Mary Dun or Mason, asserting that the pursuer has no title to pursue the action and that the defender holds an unchallengeable title to the subjects.
• LC Volume 07 — LC V7 c1829 Specification [2]

  Specification, rental and valuation of sequestrated estate lands at Ladeside, Kilbirnie, including six lots and feu duties, to be sold by trustee William Jaffray, Jr.
• Mary Dunn or Mason v. James Merry — Defences, 28 Feb 1829 [2]

  February 28, 1829 Defences by James Merry, Coal-Merchant, Canal Basin, Glasgow, to the summons of reduction at the instance of Mary Dunn or Mason, relict of James Mason, Labourer in Glasgow.
• Mortimer v. Creightons — Correspondence, 17 Mar 1829 [2]

  March 17, 1829 Correspondence in causa Mortimer v. Creightons, concerning the custody and naming of a child born out of wedlock.
• James Pollock v. Dr William Clark, Dr James Tennent, and James Henry — Complainers' Case, 12 Jun 1829

  June 12, 1829 Revised Case of James Pollock against Dr William Clark, Dr James Tennent, and James Henry, asserting liability for illegal apprehensions and imprisonments
• Renton v. Fordyce — Appendix, 2 Feb 1825

  Lord Ordinary rules that judicial error not affecting personal liberty is not actionable unless wilful or malicious, and that error causing imprisonment may be grounds for damages without alleging malice.
• Thomas Lang v. Thomas Allan and Others — Summons, 3 Nov 1829 [2]

  November 3, 1829 Summons of Damages by Thomas Lang against Thomas Allan, Esq. and others, alleging breach of sale conditions and wrongful withholding of cattle
• Thomas Lang v. Alexander Allan and Company — Bill of Suspension, 10 Oct 1829 [2]

  November 4, 1829 Bill of Suspension of Thomas Lang against Alexander Allan and Company, asking the Court to suspend the charge on bills drawn by John Rennie
• Alexander Sinclair v. Peter Sinclair — Reasons, 12 Nov 1829 [2]

  Creditor sues bankrupt advocate for alleged pre-sequestration debts, challenging admissibility of oath-in-litem and trustee book entries as evidence.
• Peter Sinclair v. Alexander Sinclair — Answers, 28 Nov 1829 [2]

  November 28, 1829 Answers by Peter Sinclair to the argument of Alexander Sinclair, asserting that the mode of proof allowed by the Sheriff is the only issue competent to this interlocutor
• Peter Sinclair v. Alexander Sinclair — Reclaiming Petition, 1 Apr 1830

  April 1, 1830 Reclaiming Note of Peter Sinclair, Vintner in Glasgow, asking the Court to recal the interlocutor complained of and remit the case to the Sheriff
• Reclaiming Note

  April 1, 1830 Reclaiming Note of Messrs John Lockhart & Sons, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
• Muir & Company v. M'Donald & M'Nab — Bill of Suspension, 29 May 1830

  May 29, 1830 Letters of Suspension of Messrs Muir and Company against M'Donald and M'Nab, arguing that the chargers unlawfully acquired a paid promissory note and cannot claim payment from the indorsers.
• Mrs Isabella M'Intosh or Ogilvie v. George Douglas — Summons, 14 Jun 1830 [2]

  June 14, 1830 Summons of Damages and Defences by Mrs Isabella M'Intosh or Ogilvie against George Douglas, alleging damages for unlawful gate closure and loss of lodgers
• Thomas Lang v. Archibald Bruce — Reclaiming Note, 2 Sep 1830 [2]

  September 2, 1830 Reclaiming Note of Thomas Lang, flesher in Glasgow, against Lord Corehouse's interlocutor
• William M'Ilwhannel v. The Glasgow Union Banking Company — Summons, 14 Oct 1830 [2]

  October 14, 1830 Summons of Declarator by William M'Ilwhannel against The Glasgow Union Banking Company, asserting his right to be reinstated as a partner after being declared a defaulter without having seen the contrac…
• Muirs v. Anderson — Bill of Suspension, 1830

  Complainers seek suspension of sheriff's decree for £17 12s wages and expenses owed to David Anderson, alleging wrongful payment based on unproven weekly rate and uncredited advances.
• LC Volume 07 — Petition, 25 Nov 1830 [2]

  November 25, 1830 Petition of Thomas Darling asking the Court to permit interim-execution against the defenders despite their appeal to the House of Lords
• Thomas Lang v. Alexander Allan and Company — Record, 19 Nov 1830

  Thomas Lang sues Alexander Allan & Co. for breach of sale terms and unlawful detention of livestock he paid for via bills, seeking recovery of cattle and ewes.
• LC Volume 07 — Revised Answers, 1831
• Thomas Lang v. Alexander Allan and Company — Reclaiming Note, 4 Jan 1831

  January 4, 1831 Reclaiming Note by Messrs Alexander Allan and Company, asking the Court to recall Lord Corehouse's interlocutor and dismiss the suspension
• Archibald Bruce v. Thomas Lang — Respondents' Case, 21 Feb 1831

  February 21, 1831 Respondents' Case by Allan & Bruce, W.S., against Archibald Bruce, asserting that the pursuer's claim for delivery of livestock sold under written conditions is without legal foundation.
• Thomas Lang v. Archibald Bruce — Revised Case, 21 Feb 1831

  February 21, 1831 Revised Case of Thomas Lang, Flesher in Glasgow, against Archibald Bruce, asserting his right to remove cattle purchased at a public roup before Rennie's legal bankruptcy
• James S. Robertson v. Patrick Gilbert Stewart — Bill of Advocation, 6 May 1831 [2]

  May 6, 1831 Bill of Advocation by James S. Robertson, Esq. &c. against Patrick Gilbert Stewart, Esq., asking the Court to reverse interlocutors that absolved him from the action
• John Scales and Others v. James Scales and Others — Summons, 14 May 1831 [2]

  Summons of reduction improbation and declarator issued May 14, 1831, against James Scales and others for alleged forged deeds to property in Glasgow, seeking annulment and declaration of nullity under father’s 1828 sett…
• Scott & Rymer

  June 1, 1831 Note to the Lord Ordinary on the Bills by Scott & Rymer, Agent for the Pursuers, asking the Court to direct transmission and extraction of Admiralty decrees against debtors residing in different counties.
• Mrs Margaret Bulloch v. James Paterson, &c. — Summons, 14 Jul 1830

  Mrs Margaret Bulloch seeks annual support from trust estates of her deceased husband and uncle, held by trustees, for herself and her children.
• LC Volume 07 — Petition, 2 Jun 1831 [2]

  June 2, 1831 Petition of John Scales, Park Scales, David Scales Cleland, and Douglas Scales asking the Court to sequestrate the rents of the subjects belonging to the late William Scales and to appoint a judicial factor…
• Mary Dun, or Mason v. James Merry — Reclaiming Note, 3 Jun 1831 [2]

  June 3, 1831 Reclaiming Note by Mrs Mary Dun, or Mason, against Lord Moncrieff's interlocutor
• Mrs Margaret Bulloch or Scott v. James Paterson, Donald Cuthbertson, and James Hamilton — Answers, 6 Jun 1831

  June 6, 1831 Defences by James Paterson, Donald Cuthbertson, and James Hamilton, Trustees of David and William Scott, against Mrs Margaret Bulloch, asserting they are not liable for expenses incurred in the action of re…
• LC Volume 07 — Defences, 15 Jun 1831
• Robina Lyon v. James Scales — Defences, 16 Jun 1831

  June 16, 1831 Answers by James Scales to the summons brought by Robina Lyon, denying receipt of money and asserting the summons is legally insufficient
• LC Volume 07 — Opinion, 17 Jun 1831
• Thomas Lang v. Archibald Bruce — Opinion, 27 Jun 1831 [2]

  June 27, 1831 Opinion by Lords Glenlee, Cringletie, Fullerton and Moncreiff in Lang against Bruce, Rennie's Trustee, holding that the sale was not completed by delivery and that the pursuer was entitled to demand delive…
• LC Volume 07 — Revised Answers, 27 Jun 1831

  June 27, 1831 Answers by Mrs Lillias Ballandene to the argument made by John Maclaurin, W.S., that his agency in the reference to Mr Scott was lawful and binding
• LC Volume 07 — Reclaiming Note, 27 Sep 1831

  September 1, 1831 Reclaiming Note of John Young, grain-merchant in Glasgow, asking the Court to alter Lord Newton's interlocutor in an action against A. W. and G. Smart, Merchants, Montrose.
• Park Scales and David Scales Cleland v. William Dick — Summons, 8 Nov 1851

  November 8, 1831 Summons by Messrs Park Scales and David Scales Cleland, trust-disponees and executors of the late Mr John Scales, against William Dick, merchant in Glasgow, demanding payment of a debt and process expen…
• Robert Stewart v. Mrs. Janet Pollock — Bill of Advocation, 12 Nov 1831 [2]

  November 12, 1831 Bill of Advocation by Robert Stewart against Mrs. Janet Pollock, asking the Court to overturn recent interlocutors affirming the defender's right to retain profits from the solum
• Alexander, William, and George Smart v. John Young — Appendix to Reclaiming Note, 17 Nov 1831 [2]

  Correspondence between grain merchants regarding unsettled accounts, wheat consignments, and disputed payment terms leading to a composition agreement.
• LC Volume 07 — Summons, 17 Oct 1831

  November 26, 1831 Summons of Declarator by James Scales, Writer in Glasgow, against David Scales Cleland, Writer in Glasgow, seeking to have his partnership status found and declared
• John Kirkland and Others v. John Slater — Opinion, 10 Dec 1831

  December 10, 1831 Opinion of the Lords of the First Division and Permanent Lords Ordinary, holding that declarations of the bankrupt Rowley taken in sequestration ought not to have been admitted as evidence on trial.
• Mary Dun or Mason v. James Merry — Defences, 19 Dec 1831

  December 19, 1831 Defences by James Merry against the summons of reduction and improbation, asserting that prior actions are still pending and that the pursuer lacks title to reduce the deeds in question.
• David Wark and Mary Hunter or Wark v. John Hay — Summons, 1832 [2]

  David Wark and his wife Mary Hunter sue John Hay for slanderous statements and threats alleging prior sexual relations with Mary Hunter, demanding £1000 damages and costs.
• James Matthew v. Mrs Alison Muckle or Neil — Summons, 31 Jan 1832 [2]

  Summons to reduce and annul disputed feu rights, declare non-entry since 1830, and poind ground for unpaid duties and process costs.
• Park Scales, David Scales Cleland v. William Dick — Defences, 13 Jan 1832

  January 13, 1832 Answers by William Dick to the argument of Park Scales and David Scales Cleland, that he refused to pay a sum advanced to him for business purposes
• Mary Dun, or Mason v. James Merry — Reclaiming Note, 14 Feb 1832

  February 14, 1832 Reclaiming Note by Mary Dun, relict of James Mason, against James Merry, asking the Court to remit the case ob contingentiam to the prior reduction action
• Catherine Moir or Laurie, Mr Stevenson and Martha Stevenson v. Henry Reid Sen., John Wilson and John Gardner — Defences, 30 May 1832

  May 30, 1832 Answers by Catherine Moir, et al. to the argument of Henry Reid Sen. et al. that the defenders are liable for losses from the Dumbarton Castle and Surprise adventures.
• Thomas Lang v. Archibald Bruce, Esq., Rennie's Trustee — Reclaiming Note, 29 Jun 1832

  June 29, 1832 Reclaiming Note by Thomas Lang, asking the Court to fix a day for hearing before the long vacation
• Wilson's Trustees v. Rev. Hamilton Paul — Summons, 4 Sep 1832

  September 4, 1832 Summons of Declarator, Denuding, &c. by Wilson's Trustees against the Rev. Hamilton Paul, and Others, demanding denudation of trust property and accounting for intromissions.
• Thomson Paul v. Walter Malcolm — Answers, 6 Sep 1832 [2]

  September 6, 1832 Answers by Walter Malcolm, Writer in Edinburgh, to the petition and complaint at the instance of Thomson Paul, W. S.
• LC Volume 07 — Petition, 29 Nov 1832 [2]

  William Baird petitions court to enforce House of Lords judgment reversing prior rulings and grant interdict against Robert Ross’s cart use on disputed land.
• John Wingfield Junior v. Thomas Smellie and James Waddell — Summons, 11 Oct 1833 [2]

  John Wingfield, trustee in a sequestration, sues Thomas Smellie and James Waddell for unpaid expenses totaling £42:0:11 plus interest, under a bond of caution.
• Rev. Mathew Graham v. John Stevenson — Defences, 5 Mar 1833 [2]

  March 5, 1833 Defences by John Stevenson, Accountant in Edinburgh, to the summons at the instance of the Rev. Mathew Graham, asserting that the pursuer must first discuss the principals before proceeding against him.
• Andrew Thomson v. John M'Gill — Bill of Suspension, 12 Mar 1833 [2]

  March 12, 1833 Bill of Suspension of Andrew Thomson against John M'Gill, seeking to suspend a bill alleged to be assigned through Black and Steel, and asserting the chargers hold the complainer's property infeftment
• Dalglish, Dick, and Company v. Roderick Nicolson and Others — Summons, 13 May 1833 [2]

  May 13, 1833 Summons by Messrs DalGLISH, Dick, and Company, soap and candle manufacturers in Glasgow, against Roderick Nicolson and others, proprietors of the Bennevis steam-boat, demanding payment of debts and costs.
• Mary Dunn or Mason v. James Merry — Reclaiming Note, 14 May 1833 [2]

  May 29, 1833 Reclaiming Note by Mary Dunn or Mason against Lord Moncreiff's interlocutor
• Mary Dun v. James Merry — Appendix, 5 Jul 1833 [2]

  July 5, 1833 Respondent's Appendix in causa Mary Dun v. James Merry, containing the roup articles and sasine record for land in Glasgow.
• Thomas Whitfield v. Macdonald and Macnab — Summons, 15 Jul 1833

  July 15, 1833 Summons of Thomas Whitfield, Clerk in Glasgow, against Macdonald and Macnab, Spirit-Dealers in Glasgow, charging them with illegal diligence and damages.
• Mrs Ann Stewart v. Mrs Mary Miller Watson — Bill of Advocation, 28 Aug 1833

  Aug 28, 1833: Mrs Ann Stewart seeks court to revise interlocutor denying her liability for liferent sums due to her deceased children.
• LC Volume 07 — Advocation, 28 Aug 1833
• LC Volume 07 — Reclaiming Note, 26 Sep 1833

  September 26, 1833 Reclaiming Petition of Alexander Sinclair, against Lord Fullerton's interlocutor
• Scott's Trustees v. Miller or M'Arthur, & Others — Summons, 30 Sep 1833

  September 30, 1833 Summons of Declarator by Scott's Trustees against Miller or M'Arthur and others, requiring proof of the tenor of a 1801 disposition and sasine.
• Suspension. 1833

  October 10, 1833 Bill of Suspension of Thomas Smellie and James Waddell against John Wingfield, jun., charging £60 commission as trustee under sequestration of Smellie's estate.
• Dalglish, Dick, & Co. v. M'Kenzie's Executors — Summons, 11 Oct 1833

  October 11, 1833 Supplementary Summons by Messrs DALGLISH, DICK, and COMPANY against Lewis M'Iver and others, executors of John M'Kenzie, senior, merchant in Stornoway, seeking decree for debts due from the steam-boat B…
• Robert Kennoway Ross v. Thomas Smellie and James Waddell — Defences, 25 Nov 1833 [2]

  November 25, 1833 Defences by Thomas Smellie and James Waddell, denying the sums claimed by Robert Kennoway Ross's assignee and asserting the action must be conjoined with that against the trustee
• William Clark v. George Lewis — Defences, 26 Nov 1833 [2]

  November 26, 1833 Defences by George Lewis, Esq. denying that he is bound to receive or maintain a burn alleged to flow through his lands, and asserting that the pursuer diverted the water and created the drain himself.
• LC Volume 07 — Defences, 27 Nov 1833
• Scott's Trustees v. John Reid & Others — State of the Process, 1834 [2]

  Trustees seek declarator to prove tenor of 1801 land disposition from William Miller to John Reid, contested by heirs and assignees.
• James Merry v. Mary Dun or Mason — Summons, 13 Feb 1834 [2]

  February 13, 1834 Summons of Proving the Tenor by James Merry against Mary Dun or Mason, asking the Court to find and declare the tenor of a lost 1791 disposition and ratification of land in Glasgow.
• LC Volume 07 — Petition, 5 Mar 1834 [2]

  March 5, 1834 Petition of Samuel James Hallam, Tea-Dealer, Waterloo Place, Edinburgh, asking the Court to permit interim execution despite an appeal pending against the interlocutor of January 18, 1834
• LC Volume 07 — Reclaiming Petition, 3 Apr 1834

  April 3, 1833 Reclaiming Petition of Mrs Ann Stewart, against Lord Fullerton's interlocutor
• LC V7 Reclaiming Note, 3 Apr 1834

  Mrs Rankine seeks to reclaim funds from her late husband's estate, arguing improper application to general executry vs. Hannah Watson's account, and requests alteration or remittal of interlocutor.
• LC Volume 07 — Reclaiming Note, 3 Apr 1834
• Mrs Ann Stewart or Watson v. Mrs Mary Miller Watson or Rankine — Appendix, 9 May 1834

  May 9, 1834 Appendix to Reclaiming Note of Mrs Ann Stewart or Watson and Others, against Mrs Mary Miller Watson or Rankine, detailing accounts of charge and discharge from 1814 to 1830.
• Mrs Mary Miller Watson and Husband v. Mrs Ann Stewart or Watson — Appendix, 9 May 1834

  May 9, 1834 Appendix of Mrs Watson, against Mrs Rankine, &c., containing depositions and documents relating to trustees’ meetings and property settlements.
• Additional Appendix to Reclaiming Note, Mrs Watson against Lord Fullerton's Interlocutor

  May 19, 1834 Additional Appendix to Reclaiming Note of Mrs Watson, arguing that the defender is bound to account for £130 instalments paid to her as trustee for Hannah Watson and the pursuer.
• James Merry v. Mary Dun or Mason — Defences, 24 May 1834

  May 24, 1834 Answers by Mary Dun or Mason to the argument of James Merry that the defender homologated the transaction by granting a disposition
• Grainger and Miller v. John Cross and Others — Summons, 1834

  Civil engineers Grainger and Miller sue shareholders and committee members for unpaid fees and interest from railway survey work in 1830–1832.
• James Merry v. Mary Dun or Masson — Condescendence, 11 Jun 1834

  June 11, 1834 Condescendence of James Merry asking the Court to prove the tenor of his title against Mary Dun or Masson
• James Merry v. Mary Dun or Masson — Condescendence, 11 Jun 1834 [4]

  June 11, 1834 Condescendence of James Merry, Coal-Merchant, offering to prove the tenor of his action against Mary Dun or Masson
• James Merry v. Mary Dun or Mason — Answers, 18 Jun 1834 [2]

  June 18, 1834 Answers by James Taylor, S. S. C. Defender's Agent, to the argument of the pursuer that the defender executed dispositions and deeds in favour of John Ker and others
• John Carfrae v. Thomas Lang — Defences, 1 Jul 1834 [2]

  July 1, 1834 Defences by Thomas Lang against the summing of John Carfrae, asserting that the table in question was his property and not carried off by him
• Suspension. 1834

  November 19, 1834 Bill of Suspension of John Wilson, tallow-chandler in Glasgow, against Ewing, May, and Company, merchants in Glasgow, challenging the validity of a decree and bond of caution.
• LC Volume 07 — Petition, 15 Dec 1834
• Samuel Asbury v. John William Bell — Answers, 5 Dec 1835

  January 12, 1835 Answers by John William Bell to the bill of suspension and interdict presented against him and others, asserting the bill is incompetent and groundless
• Andrew Dow and William Couper v. Archibald Young — Summons, 29 Jan 1836

  February 25, 1835 Summons of Count, Reckoning, and Payment by Andrew Dow and William Couper against Archibald Young, demanding production of accounts and payment of L.1500 or L.2000 as balance due from his intromissions
• James Merry v. Mary Dun or Mason — State of the Process, 2 Mar 1835 [2]

  March 2, 1835 State of the Process by James Merry, pursuer, against Mary Dun or Mason, defender, proving tenor of disposition and ratification dated May 31, 1791.
• LC Volume 07 — Reclaiming Petition, 9 Apr 1835

  April 9, 1835 Reclaiming Note of Dr. R. Whitehead against Lord Jeffrey's interlocutor
• James Merry v. Mary Dun or Mason — Report, 1 Oct 1835 [2]

  October 1, 1835 Report of Deposition of Robert Grahame, in process of proving the tenor, James Merry against Mary Dun or Mason.
• E. Gibb & Others v. Currie's Creditors — Summons, 27 Oct 1835

  October 27, 1835 Summons by Elias Gibb and others, trustees for creditors of Mrs Jean Walkinshaw or Currie, against John M'Nellan and others, demanding payment of assessed claims.
• James and Andrew Muir v. John and Samuel Muir — Bill of Exceptions, 1835

  Defenders James and Andrew Muir challenge the admissibility of an account-sales document presented by pursuer John Muir to prove coffee sales and debt, arguing lack of authentication, absence of adoption by plaintiffs, …
• Samuel James Hallam v. Gye and Company — Record, 5 Dec 1835

  Pursuer claims wrongful dismissal and retaliatory legal actions by defenders after managing their Edinburgh tea shop; defenders deny misconduct and assert legitimate creditor proceedings.
• Samuel James Hallam v. Frederick Gye and Company, Frederick Gye, and Richard Hughes — Issues, 5 Dec 1835

  December 5, 1835 Issues in the cause of Samuel J. Hallam, Tea-Dealer, against Gye & Company, asserting that words inserted in a pleading are false, calumnious, and maliciously inserted
• Elias Gibb and Others v. Gillon and Rule and Others — Defences, 12 Dec 1835

  December 12, 1835 Defences by Gillon and Rule, &c. against Gibb and Others, asserting that the pursuers have not accounted for trust funds and lack authority to demand payment from creditors
• Hugh Robertson v. Mrs. Margaret Hill or Tait, and Misses Mary Hill — Reclaiming Note, 15 Dec 1835

  January 7, 1836 Reclaiming Note of Hugh Robertson against Lord Jeffrey's interlocutor
• Alexander, Earl of Stirling v. Smith and Chapman — Bill of Suspension, 7 Jan 1836 [2]

  January 7, 1836 Bill of Suspension by Alexander, Earl of Stirling, asking the Court to suspend the charge of payment for a bill of exchange, on grounds of peerage exemption from personal diligence.
• LC Volume 07 — Answers, 12 Jan 1836

  January 12, 1836 Answers by John William Bell to the bill of suspension and interdict presented against him by John Cooper
• John Cooper v. John William Bell & Others — Bill of Suspension, 15 Jan 1836

  January 15, 1836 Bill of Suspension of John Cooper, against John W. Bell & others, asking the Court to permit suspension of proceedings pending decision in similar case of Asbury v. Bell.
• John William Bell v. Samuel Asbury, Watson, Pellat, and Company, John Watson, Frederick Pellat, and John Henry Watson — Summons, 16 Jan 1836

  January 16, 1836 Summons of Damages by John William Bell, flint-glass manufacturer, against Samuel Asbury and Messrs Watson, Pellat, and Company, for desertion of servant and aiding in deforcement of officers
• John William Bell v. John Cooper — Summons, 16 Jan 1836

  January 16, 1836 Summons of Damages by John William Bell, flint-glass manufacturer, against John Cooper and Messrs Watson, Pellat and Company, alleging breach of contract and aiding in desertion
• Mrs Margaret M'Ghie v. William Wotherspoon — Answers, 21 Apr 1836 [2]

  April 21, 1836 Answers by the respondent's agents to the petition and complaint of Mrs M'Ghie, responding to her claim of money abstraction and duty dereliction
• J. Tayler and Others v. Archd. M'Lellan, Jun. &c. — Summons, 25 Apr 1836

  Pursuers, as indorsees of trust-estate accounts, claim unpaid legal fees from trustees and their representatives for services rendered in managing Mrs Jean Walkinshaw’s trust estate.
• Mrs M'Ghie v. Wm. Wotherspoon — Appendix to Answers, 12 May 1836

  May 12, 1836 Appendix to Answers by Wm. Wotherspoon, S.S.C., common agent in the ranking and sale of Cliftonhill, responding to the petition and complaint of Mrs Margaret M'Ghie.
• John William Bell v. John Cooper — Defences, 7 Jun 1836 [2]

  June 7, 1836 Defences by John Cooper, Glassblower, denying the summons and asserting he is entitled to absolvitor with expenses
• John William Bell v. Watson, Pellat & Co. and Others — Defences, 7 Jun 1836

  June 7, 1836 Defences of Watson, Pellat & Co. and others, denying liability in damages to John William Bell and asserting they acted in good faith regarding John Cooper’s employment
• LC Volume 07 — Reclaiming Note, 21 Jun 1836
• Alexander Galloway v. Archibald M'Lellan, Junior, and Others, Trustees of the deceased Mrs Jean Walkinshaw or Currie — Summons, 9 Dec 1836

  December 9, 1836 Summons of Alexander Galloway against Archibald M'Lellan, Junior, and others, Trustees of the deceased Mrs Jean Walkinshaw or Currie, demanding payment of L.149, 16s. 4½d. and interest for services rend…
• Suspension. 1837

  January 20, 1837 Bill of Suspension by John Dick, farmer at Crossford, against John Frame and others, trustees of deceased Thomas Lang, asking the Court to suspend a charge for non-payment of rent and security.
• Peter M'Intosh and Thomas Duncan v. William Armstrong — Bill of Advocation, 23 Jan 1837 [2]

  January 23, 1837 Bill of Advocation by Peter M'Intosh and Thomas Duncan against William Armstrong, seeking to have the Sheriff's interlocutor reviewed by the Lords of Council and Session
• LC Volume 07 — Petition, 26 Jan 1837 [2]

  January 26, 1837 Petition of Mrs. Jane Pott or Stewart, asking the Court to appoint Mr. Thomas Watson as curator bonis and factor loco tutoris for the children of deceased Robert Stewart
• John Macdonald, Junr. v. Alexander Gilmour — Bill of Advocation, 5 Jan 1837

  John Macdonald, junior, trustee of deceased John Stevenson, seeks judgment for £565 plus interest on a disputed promissory note against Alexander Gilmour, who denies authenticity and onerosity of the instrument.
• John Wingfield Junior v. Thomas Smellie and James Waddell — Reclaiming Note, 17 Feb 1837 [2]

  February 17, 1837 Reclaiming Note by John Wingfield Jun. against Lord Moncreiff's interlocutor, seeking to alter the finding on expenses in conjoined processes
• John Macdonald v. Alexander Gilmour and James Stevenson — Summons, 21 Feb 1837 [2]

  February 21, 1837 Summons of Reduction-Improbation by John Macdonald, trustee of the deceased John Stevenson, against A. Gilmour and J. Stevenson, demanding they answer to a claim of forged debt instruments.
• John William Bell v. Watson, Pellat, & Company — Summons, 21 Apr 1837

  Bell sues Watson, Pellat & Co. for costs incurred in enforcing a service contract against a runaway worker they employed.
• John Macdonald junior v. Alexander Gilmour — Answers, 1837

  Defender challenges validity of promissory note and pursuer’s status as onerous holder, seeking reduction-improbation based on alleged fraudulent indorsement and lack of value.
• John William Bell v. Watson, Pellat, & Co. — Answers, 7 Jun 1837

  June 7, 1837 Defences by Messrs. Watson, Pellat & Company and the individual partners, denying liability for expenses and damages claimed by John William Bell and his mandatories, asserting the claim is exhausted by pri…
• LC Volume 07 — Petition, 14 Nov 1837 [2]

  November 14, 1837 Petition of Mrs Janet Fyfe, Robert Dayer, and others, asking the Court to appoint Mr Andrew Cross as curator bonis for John Dayer and factor loco tutoris for Helen Dayer
• LC Volume 07 — Petition, 20 Nov 1837 [2]

  November 20, 1837 Petition of James Bunten, Trustee on the Sequestrated Estates of Cleland and Tassie, asking the Court to authorise acceleration of the first dividend as instructed by creditors
• Small, Colquhoun, & Company v. Henry Brock — Petition and Complaint, 20 Dec 1837

  Foreign merchants, unable to prove claims within 10 months due to overseas account delays, seek dividend delay to preserve equitable share in sequestrated estate.
• Elias Gibb and Others v. Alexander Pirgivie and Others — Answers, 26 Feb 1838

  February 26, 1838 Defences of Alexander Pirgivie and others against Gibb and others, asserting the pursuers have not accounted for trust funds and are not entitled to claim indemnification without proper vouchers.
• Daniel Swanston v. Messrs Stewart, Pott and Company, Robert Stewart and Francis Pott — Reasons, 21 Jun 1836

  April 5, 1833 Revised Reasons of Suspension of the complainer against the respondents, detailing transactions through Mr Smith and renewals of bills
• Additional Appendix to Reclaiming Note, Daniel Swanston against Lord Cockburn's Interlocutor

  June 15, 1838 Additional Appendix to Reclaiming Note, Daniel Swanston, against Lord Cockburn's interlocutor