1794
AlimentSuccessionMarriageWitnessAdjudicationInterlocutorJohn Pendrich, son of the deceased John Pendrich, baker at Rosewell, and represented by his tutor ad litem, pursued Andrew and Marion Pendrich to prove a clandestine marriage of his father. He sought admission of the Haigs as witnesses ob penuriam testium, while the defenders answered that these witnesses were inadmissible due to their familial ties and involvement in the alleged scheme. John presented a bill of advocation asking the Court to remit to the Commissaries with instruction to recall two prior interlocutors, which Andrew and Marion opposed in their answer.AI-generated
Documents in this case (3)
- John Pendrich v. Andrew and Marion Pendrichs — RepliesJohn Pendrich, son of deceased John Pendrich, baker at Rosewell, and his tutor ad litem, reply to Andrew and Marion Pendrich’s answers, seeking admission of Haigs as witnesses ob penuriam testium to prove a clandestine …
- John Pendrich v. Andrew Pendrich — Bill of Advocation, 14 Jun 1794June 14, 1794 Bill of Advocation of John Pendrich asking the Court to remit to the Commissaries with instruction to recall two prior interlocutors
- John Pendrich v. Andrew Pendrich — Answers, 19 Jun 1794June 19, 1794: Andrew & Marion Pendrich answer a bill of advocation for John Pendrich, contending proposed witnesses are inadmissible due to familial ties and involvement in the alleged scheme.
People & places in this case
People involved
- John Pendrich — Pursuer
- Andrew Pendrich — Defender
- Marion Pendrich — Defender
- John Gray — Attorney
