1773
James Sutherland pursued Elizabeth Countess of Sutherland and her Tutors regarding wadset lands of Pronsie and Evelicks, disputing whether the lands had been redeemed, whether the wadsetting of Evelicks was lawful, and whether the wadset contracts were valid. The Countess and her Tutors filed answers responding to the pursuer's petitions on each of these grounds.AI-generated
Documents in this case (3)
- Elisabeth Countess of Sutherland and her Tutors v. James Sutherland of Pronsie — Answers, 9 Oct 1773October 9, 1773 Answers by Elisabeth Countess of Sutherland and her Tutors to the petition of James Sutherland of Pronsie, responding to the claim that the wadset lands are not redeemed.
- James Sutherland of Evelicks v. Elisabeth Countess of Sutherland and her Tutors — Answers, 9 Oct 1773Answers by Elisabeth Countess of Sutherland and her Tutors to the petition of James Sutherland of Evelicks, responding to the claim that the lands of Evelicks were unlawfully wadsetted.
- James Sutherland of Pronsie v. Elisabeth Countess of Sutherland, and her Tutors — Answers, 9 Oct 1773Answers by Elisabeth Countess of Sutherland and her Tutors to the petition of James Sutherland of Pronsie, responding to the argument that the contract of wadset is invalid.
People & places in this case
People involved
- James Sutherland — Pursuer
- Elizabeth Leveson-Gower, Countess of Sutherland — Defender
