1830–1836
CautionerFactorCreditorIntromissionAlimentMandateJames Stewart, as pursuer, submitted a revised case against Alexander Scot, the defender. Based on the single document cataloged for this case.AI-generated
Documents in this case (5)
- James Baikie v. James Stewart — Rev, 20 Jan 1832January 20, 1832 Revised Case of James Baikie, Esq. against James Stewart, Esq. &c., concerning the validity of cautionary obligations and tutory subsistence post-death of tutor.
- James Stewart v. Alexander Scot — Revised, 24 Jan 1832January 24, 1832 Revised Case for James Stewart, Esq.,—Pursuer, against Alexander Scot, Esq.,—Defender.
- James Stewart v. James Baikie — Revised, 27 Jan 1832January 27, 1832 Revised Case of James Stewart, Esq. of Brugh, and his Curator, against James Baikie, Esq. of Tankerness, asserting that the cautioner remains liable during the tutory’s subsistence.
- James Stewart v. Alexander Scot — Revised, 27 Jan 1832Court orders parties to submit revised cases for Stewart v. Scot and Stewart v. Baikie, to be reported together due to material legal connection despite distinct pleas.
People & places in this case
People involved
- James Baikie, of Tankerness — Party
- William Braidwood — Party
- Archibald Stewart, of Brough — Party
- John Marshall, Lord Curriehill — Advocate for Party
- David Scot — Advocate for Party
- John Hope — Advocate for Party
- John Stevenson — Advocate for Party
- John Henderson — Advocate for Party
- Andrew Rutherfurd, of Crosshill — Advocate for Party
- Sir James Moncreiff, Lord Moncreiff — Lord Ordinary
- James Wolfe Murray, Lord Cringletie — Lord Ordinary
- John Clerk, Lord Eldin — Lord Ordinary
- Henry Jardine — Lord Ordinary
- Charles Hay, of Newton, Lord Newton — Lord Ordinary
- George Veitch — Named in case documents
