Date15 Jun 1798TypePetitionCaseInglis v. BethuneAuthorHenry David InglisRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 15Appendix1 item Abstract AI-generated Petitioner William Inglis seeks to reverse a court’s finding that defender William Bethune’s 1786 holograph bond was mere corroboration, not new security, to hold him jointly liable for half the debt. View larger map →People in this documentWilliam Craig, Lord Craig✳James Murray, of Broughton✳James Loch✳SubjectsDebt✳Bankruptcy✳Cautioner✳Interlocutor✳Diligence✳Assignation✳Security✳Action✳Places mentionedMauchline✳Edinburgh✳England✳Broughton✳