1794
Bill of ExchangeDiligenceInterlocutorBankruptcyArrestmentDebtHuggan petitioned the Court to alter its recent interlocutor against the suspender George Jardine and to find the letters orderly proceeded. Gray responded, arguing that Huggan lacked proper title to proceed in diligence and that no due notification of dishonour had been made to him.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Huggan v. Gray — Petition, 3 Jun 1794June 3, 1794 Petition of the petitioner asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor against the suspender, George Jardine, and to find the letters orderly proceeded
- Andrew Huggan v. John Gray — Answers, 19 Jun 1794June 19, 1794 Information of the respondent, arguing that the petitioner lacks proper title to proceed in diligence and that no due notification of dishonour was made to him
People & places in this case
People involved
- James Turnbull — Party
- George Jardine — Party
- Sir James Montgomery, of Stanhope, Bart. — Advocate for Party
- Alexander Abercromby, Lord Abercromby — Lord Ordinary
- John Swinton, Lord Swinton — Lord Ordinary
