1782
Bill (Financial Instrument)WitnessThis case was about liability for a bill, and the manner in which that liability could be proved. For reasons that were disputed, defenders Thomas Hunter and James Edmund became drawers on a bill that was accepted by pursuer John Houston. The bill was then discounted at a bank to raise money for one James Osburn. At the same time, a back-bill from Osburn and his business partner was placed in the hands of Edmund. Houston alleged that he, Hunter, and Edumund had agreed to take on joint liability for the bill he accepted; Hunter and Edmund denied this. Additionally, Hunter and Edmund challenged the propriety of examining Osburn as a witness, on the ground that he was too closely connected with Houston.
Documents in this case (2)
- Houston v. Hunter and Edmund — Petition, 29 Nov 1782November 29, 1782 Petition of the petitioners asking the Court to assoilzie them from the pursuer's claim for L. 40 Sterling, on grounds that they were merely drawers of a bill and received no money
- John Houston Mason v. Thomas Hunter and James Edmond — Answers, 12 Dec 1782December 12, 1782 Petition of the Petitioners asking the Court to alter the interlocutor remitted by the Lord Ordinary, which directs the Magistrates to decern against the Defenders unless they prove their defences by w…
People & places in this case
People involved
- John Houston — Pursuer
- Thomas Hunter — Defender
- James Edmond — Defender
- George Fergusson, of Hermand, Lord Hermand — Advocate for Pursuer
- William Craig, Lord Craig — Advocate for Defender
- John Campbell, Lord Stonefield — Lord Ordinary
- James Osburn — Named in case documents