Haig v. Lord Swinton's Interlocutor

First page of the earliest case document

First page — click to view

1786

DebtCreditorSuccessionArrestmentPassive TitleBill of Exchange

James Haig petitioned against Lord Swinton's interlocutor, asserting that he had incurred no universal passive title as a vitious intromitter. Based on the single document cataloged for this case.

Documents in this case (1)

Haig v. Lord Swinton's Interlocutor — Petition, 28 Feb 1786
February 28, 1786 Petition of James Haig, against Lord Swinton's interlocutor, asserting he incurred no universal passive title as vitious intromitter

People & places in this case

People involved

Robert Gillespie — Party
John Swinton, Lord Swinton — Lord Ordinary

Places

Where this case took place

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)