1768
Gibson sought revision of an interlocutor against Watson, arguing that strict statutory interpretation, pre-Union hunting rights, magistrate authorization, and the 1768 Act's repeal of the 1734 statute justified the request. Based on the single document cataloged for this case.AI-generated
Documents in this case (1)
- Gibson v. Watson — Reasons of Appeal, 29 Feb 1768Feb 29, 1768: Appellants seek court to revise interlocutor, citing strict statutory interpretation, pre-Union hunting rights, magistrate authorization, and 1768 act’s repeal of 1734 statute.
People & places in this case
People involved
- John Gibson — Pursuer
- William Walker — Pursuer
- John Watson, senior — Defender
- John Watson, junior — Defender
- James Robertson — Defender
- Andrew Henshie — Defender
- William Wast — Defender
- Gilbert Macmillan — Defender
- Archibald Roy — Defender
- Robert Brown — Defender
