1765
George Dalziel, innkeeper at Linton, petitioned the Court to alter a recent interlocutor in his dispute with Allan Lockhart of Cleghorn regarding a lease agreement. Lockhart answered, denying allegations of deception and false averments in the lease, and Dalziel replied defending his possession and disputing claims of fraud and misrepresentation.AI-generated
Documents in this case (3)
- George Dalziel v. Lockhart of Cleghorn — Petition, 25 Jan 1765January 25, 1765 Petition of George Dalziel asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
- George Dalziel v. Allan Lockhart — Answers, 13 Feb 1765February 13, 1765 Answers by Allan Lockhart of Cleghorn to the petition of George Dalziel, responding to allegations of deception and false averments in the lease agreement.
- Allan Lockhart v. George Dalziel — Replies, 20 Feb 1765February 20, 1765 Replies of George Dalziel, Innkeeper at Linton, to the Answers of Allan Lockhart of Cleghorn, Esq, defending his possession and disputing the pursuer's allegations of fraud and misrepresentation.
People & places in this case
People involved
- George Dalziel — Pursuer, Innkeeper
- Allan Lockhart — Defender
Published Reports
William Morison, The Decisions of the Court of Session (1811), pg. 15260
| The information regarding this case was derived from an import courteously provided by the Baillii Database of Scottish Court of Session Decisions. In terms of the SCOS project, this databases uses respective BAILII entries as metadata shells for case materials present in the SCOS project partners respective repositories. |
