1781
Power of AttorneyThis case was about an individual’s authority to act as attorney for Walter Peter, a Virginia merchant, in a case pending in Scotland. Messrs. Dunlop and Montgomery, the pursuers, sued Peter for payment of a debt that he allegedly owed them. When George Anderson appeared on Walter’s behalf, the pursuers claimed that he had no authority to do so. Although Anderson produced a power of attorney from Peter, the pursuers argued that it existed for the limited purpose of allowing Anderson to handle Peter’s succession to a particular estate.
Documents in this case (2)
- Dunlop and Montgomery v. Peter — Petition, 17 Jul 1781July 17, 1781 Petition of George Anderson asking the Court to alter the interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary, which refused his representation in a process against Walter Peter
- Mess. Dunlop and Montgomery v. Walter Peter — answers, 28 Jul 1781July 28, 1781 Petition of George Anderson asking the Court to permit him to defend Walter Peter in an action for debt, despite the power of attorney produced being limited to succession matters
People & places in this case
People involved
- Mess. Dunlop and Montgomery — Pursuer
- Walter Peter — Defender
- George Anderson — Trustee/Tutor/Representative for Defender
- William Craig, Lord Craig — Advocate for Pursuer
- William Tait — Advocate for Defender
- Henry Home, of Kames, Lord Kames — Lord Ordinary
- David Peter — Named in case documents
- Alexander Peter — Named in case documents