1798–1799
SuccessionEntailTailzieInfeftmentDebtTeindsSir Benjamin Dunbar, pursuer, presented a reclaiming petition asking the Court to alter its interlocutor of 2 February 1799, which had assoilzied him from the conclusions of his action against the defenders, the Dunbars, et al. Based on the single document cataloged for this case.AI-generated
Documents in this case (3)
- Sir Benjamin Dunbar v. George, Henrietta, Louisa, and Elizabeth Dunbar — Information, 6 Sep 1798September 6, 1798 Information of George, Henrietta, Louisa, and Elizabeth Dunbar, Children of Sir Benjamin Dunbar, arguing that the entail of 1707 does not bind them to the dignity of Baronet
- Sir Benjamin Dunbar v. George, Louisa, Henrietta, and Elisabeth Dunbar; Charles Young — Information, 6 Sep 1798September 6, 1798 Information of Sir Benjamin Dunbar of Hempriggs, Baronet, arguing that the prohibitory clauses of the tailzie do not extend to him as an heir of the estate only, not of the dignity.
- Dunbar — Petition, 13 Feb 1799February 13, 1799 Reclaiming Petition of Sir Benjamin Dunbar, asking the Court to alter its interlocutor of February 2, 1799, which assoilzied him from the conclusions of his action.
People & places in this case
People involved
- James Dunbar — Party
- Alexander Young, W.S., of Harburn — Advocate for Party
- Alexander Murray, Lord Henderland — Lord Ordinary
Places
- Edinburgh (principal)
- Scotland
- Breadalbane
- Dunbar
