1796
DebtCreditorBill of ExchangeSequestrationPartnershipInterlocutorRobert Campbell, as pursuer, petitioned the Court to alter its interlocutor suspending his charge for a bill of exchange he had accepted without value in the action against Laidlaw, the defender. Robert Corbet thereafter informed the Court that the bill had been accepted for the accommodation of Archibald M'Ausland rather than Milligan and Co.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Campbell — Petition, 1 Sep 1796September 1, 1796 Petition of Robert Campbell asking the Court to alter its interlocutor suspending his charge for a bill he accepted without value
- Robert Campbell v. William Laidlaw — Answers, 16 Dec 1796December 16, 1796 Information of Robert Corbet, arguing that the bill in question was accepted for the accommodation of Archibald M'Ausland, not Milligan and Co.
People & places in this case
People involved
- James Milligan — Party
- John Campbell, Lord Stonefield — Party
- William Laidlaw — Party
- John Clerk, Lord Eldin — Advocate for Party
- Robert Corbet — Advocate for Party
- William Craig, Lord Craig — Lord Ordinary
