1788
AlimentDebtSuccessionInterdictionTrusteeTrustJohn Braimer, late of Edrom, as pursuer, petitioned the Court to alter Lord Stonefield's interlocutor, which maintained Braimer's interdiction and declared the trustees not bound to pay over the balance. Gilbert Innes of Stow and John Lothian, merchant in Edinburgh, as defenders, answered the petition, resisting Braimer's claim for reversion and discharge of the interdiction.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Braimer v. Innes and Lothian — Petition, 11 Jul 1788July 11, 1788 Petition of John Braimer, against Lord Stonefield's interlocutor, asking the Court to alter its ruling that the interdiction remains in force and the trustees are not bound to pay the balance.
- John Braimer v. Gilbert Innes and John Lothian — Answers, 24 Sep 1788September 24, 1788 Answers by Gilbert Innes, Esq; of Stow; and John Lothian, Merchant in Edinburgh, to the petition of John Braimer, late of Edrom, responding to his claim for reversion and discharge of interdiction.
People & places in this case
People involved
- John Spottiswoode, of Spottiswoode — Party
- George Lothian — Party
- Samuel Mitchelson Jr., of Clermiston — Party
- Henry Erskine — Advocate for Party
- Alexander Wight — Advocate for Party
- John Campbell, Lord Stonefield — Lord Ordinary
Places
- Edinburgh (principal)
- Edrom
- Stow
- Musselburgh
- Prestonpans
