1791
PerjuryWitnessTrialOathThe pursuers alleged that Alexander Durham perjured himself in a trial before the Circuit Court of Justiciary at Perth by falsely swearing that James Brown was present during Durham's examination. Based on the single document cataloged for this case.
Documents in this case (1)
- Appendix for Durham — Appendix, 8 Sep 1791September 8, 1791 Information of the pursuers, arguing that Alexander Durham perjured himself in a trial before the Circuit Court of Justiciary at Perth, by falsely swearing James Brown was present during Durham's exami…
People & places in this case
People involved
- David Syme — Party
- James Tait — Party
- Sir William Macleod Bannatyne, of Kames, Lord Bannatyne — Party
- James Clark — Party
- Thomas Henderson — Party
- James Dewar, of Vorgrie, Esq — Party
- Sir David Rae, Lord Eskgrove, 1st Baronet — Advocate for Party
- John Campbell, Lord Stonefield — Advocate for Party
- Sir Robert Anstruther, of Balcaskie, 3rd Baronet of Nova Scotia — Advocate for Party
- Claud Irvine Boswell, of Balmuto, Lord Balmuto — Advocate for Party
- Peter Reid — Named in case documents
