1782
Andrew Thomson pursued a bill of suspension with Alexander Ruffell against William Thomson and Andrew Tod regarding a bill granted jointly by Thomson and Ruffell. The suspenders challenged Thomson's claim that he had properly filled his name as sole drawer and was alone entitled to the bill's contents, while Thomson petitioned to alter interlocutors suspending the letters simpliciter and sought expenses against the suspenders.AI-generated
Documents in this case (4)
- Thomson — Petition, 25 Jan 1782January 25, 1782 Petition of Andrew Thomson asking the Court to alter its interlocutor concerning a bill of suspension involving himself and Alexander Ruffel against suspenders William Thomson and Andrew Tod
- William Thomson in Cairnybridge and Andrew Tod of Feal v. Andrew Thomson in Burnmiln — Answers, 19 Feb 1782February 19, 1782 Information of the suspender Andrew Tod, arguing that the petitioner Andrew Thomson improperly filled his name as sole drawer on a bill granted jointly with Alexander Ruffell
- Thomson — Petition, 6 Mar 1782March 6, 1782 Petition of Andrew Thomson asking the Court to alter its interlocutor suspending the letters simpliciter and to find the suspenders liable in expences
- Thomson — Answers, 20 Apr 1782April 20, 1782 Answers by the suspenders to the argument of Andrew Thomson that he alone is entitled to the bill's contents
