1795
ArrestmentDebtAlimentStipendCreditorHeritorAndrew Storie, as factor for the representatives of James Aitken, petitioned the Court to alter an interlocutor of Lord Monboddo regarding whether creditors could attach a minister’s stipend. The respondent maintained that the stipend was alimentary in nature and therefore immune from attachment.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Storie — Petition, 6 Jun 1795June 6, 1795 Petition of Andrew Storie, factor for the Representatives of James Aitken stabler, asking the Court to alter the interlocutor of Lord Monboddo concerning the attachability of a minister's stipend to credito…
- Andrew Storie v. The Reverend Dr William Burn — Answers, 2 Jul 1795July 2, 1795 Information of the respondent, arguing that a minister's stipend is alimentary and therefore unattachable by creditors
People & places in this case
People involved
- David Cathcart, Lord Alloway — Party
- Adam Ogilvie, of Hartwoodmyres — Party
- James Inglis Jr. — Party
- Robert Craigie — Advocate for Party
- Thomas Walker Baird — Advocate for Party
- Sir Walter Scott, of Abbotsford, Bart. — Advocate for Party
- James Burnett, Lord Monboddo — Lord Ordinary
- Henry Home, of Kames, Lord Kames — Lord Ordinary
