1790
CreditorDebtBill of ExchangeForgeryReductionPromissory noteDefender Peter Belch argued that the indorsement by Rankine and Son was genuine and that he held no material interest in the matter, as he would recover value from David Mitchell, who had received full value. Based on the single document cataloged for this case.
Documents in this case (1)
- Peter Belch v. John Rankine and Son — Memorial, 7 Jan 1790Peter Belch argues the Rankine and Son indorsement is genuine and he has no material interest, as he’ll recover value from David Mitchell who received full value.
People & places in this case
People involved
- David Mitchell — Party
- Donald Macdonald — Party
