1829–1837
Case documents digitized and available. Description in progress.
Documents in this case (7)
- Hugh Rose v. Trustees of the late Kenneth Macleay — Record, 24 Nov 1829 [2]November 24, 1829 State of the Process in Count and Reckoning, Rose v. Macleay, &c., as authenticated in process of count and reckoning at the instance of Hugh Rose, against the Trustees of the late Kenneth Macleay.
- Hugh Rose v. Representatives of Kenneth M'Leay — Defenders Appendix, 24 Nov 1829November 24, 1829 Defender's Appendix to Record in process, Hugh Rose, Esq. of Glastullich, against the representatives of Kenneth M'Leay of Newmore.
- Hugh Rose v. M'Leay's Trustees — Pursuers Appendix, 24 Nov 1829 [2]November 24, 1829 Pursuer's Appendix of Hugh Rose, Esq. against M'Leay's Trustees, containing writings printed by Rose relative to revised condescendence in process of count and reckoning originally raised by him
- Hugh Rose v. Macleay's Representatives — Appendix, 9 Mar 1830 [2]Appendix to March 9, 1830 reclaiming note listing missing vouchers, accounts, and docs in Hugh Rose’s dealings with Munro and Brown, Macleay, and government.
- Isabella Macleay v. Hugh Rose — Petition, 12 May 1830May 1830 petition by Mrs Isabella Macleay et al., representing deceased Kenneth Macleay, seeking recall of inhibition against Hugh Rose, Esq. of Glastullich.
- Mrs Isabella M'Leay, Alexander M'Leay, Donald Horne, and William Sharpe M'Leay v. Hugh Rose — Answers, 14 Jun 1830June 14, 1830 Answers by Hugh Rose, Esq. of Glastullich, to the petition of Mrs Isabella M'Leay and others, responding to their request for recal of inhibition
- Hugh Rose v. Trustees of the deceased Kenneth M'Leay — Additional Appendix, 22 Jun 1830June 22, 1830 Additional Appendix for pursuer Hugh Rose, Esquire of Glastullich, against the Trustees of the deceased Kenneth M'Leay, Esquire of Newmore, detailing exhibits and depositions under commission.
