1793–1794
DebtBankruptcyCreditorBill of ExchangeSequestrationDeedWilliam M'Taggart answered the petition of Messrs. Hamilton and Co. and James Provan and Co., who claimed that a sale of goods was void under the 1696 Act. Based on the single document cataloged for this case.AI-generated
Documents in this case (3)
- Hamilton — Petition, 27 Jun 1793June 27, 1793 Petition of Messrs. Hamilton and Company, Manufacturers in Glasgow, and of James Provan and Company, Merchants there, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
- Hamilton and Co. and James Provan and Co. v. William M'Taggart — Answers, 7 Jan 1794January 7, 1794 Answers by William M'Taggart to the petition of Messrs. Hamilton and Co. and James Provan and Co., responding to their claim that the sale of goods was void under the 1696 Act.
People & places in this case
People involved
- Donald MacMath — Party
- Robert Cullen, Lord Cullen — Advocate for Party
- Robert Corbet — Advocate for Party
- Alexander Murray, Lord Henderland — Lord Ordinary
