Gordon of Cluny v. John Anderson

Documents in this case (9)

• Gordon of Cluny v. John Anderson — Articles and Conditions, 29 May 1801
• Lieutenant-Colonel John Gordon of Cluny v. John Anderson, late Tacksman of Kirktown of Slains, and Others — Summons, 3 Oct 1823

  October 3, 1823 Summons of Damages of Lieutenant-Colonel John Gordon against John Anderson & Others, seeking damages for failure to use fodder of way-going crop as per lease regulations.
• Gordon of Cluny v. James Robertson and Others; John Anderson and Others — Opinion, 8 Mar 1825

  March 8, 1825 Opinion of the Judges of the Court of Session in Causis Gordon v. Robertson, &c. and Anderson, &c.
• Gordon of Cluny v. John Anderson — Opinion, 8 Mar 1825
• Lieutenant-Colonel John Gordon of Cluny v. John Anderson, Adam Gray, Alexander Shepherd, Thomas Garland, &c. — Additional, 4 Dec 1830

  December 4, 1830 Additional Defences of John Anderson, Adam Gray, Alexander Shepherd, Thomas Garland, &c. to the Summons of Damages by Lieutenant-Colonel John Gordon of Cluny, asserting the action is incompetent and mus…
• Gordon of Cluny v. John Anderson — Record, 29 Nov 1832

  November 29, 1832 Record of Lieutenant-Colonel John Gordon of Cluny, and Answers for John Anderson and Others, concerning the application of lease regulations to fodder of the last crop.
• Gordon of Cluny v. John Anderson — Record, 29 Nov 1832

  November 29, 1832 Record of Lieutenant-Colonel John Gordon of Cluny, and Answers for John Anderson and Others, concerning the application of lease regulations to fodder of the last crop.
• Colonel Gordon of Cluny v. John Anderson and Others — Revised, 1 Feb 1833

  February 1, 1833 Revised Case of John Anderson & Others, defenders, arguing that the pursuer has no equitable claim of reparation for straw lost due to interdict and that they are entitled to be assoilzied from damages.
• Lieutenant-Colonel Gordon of Cluny v. John Anderson and the Trustees for the Creditors of James H. Mudie — Revised, 19 Feb 1833

  Colonel Gordon sues Anderson and Mudie’s trustees for damages from fodder lost due to defendants’ refusal to use it on farm under lease terms, after House of Lords judgment on lease interpretation.