1832
BankruptcyDebtFraudCreditorArrestmentSequestrationThe Dean and Faculty of Advocates opposed William Rae's admission to the Faculty on Trial, arguing that he should not be admitted to the Office of Advocate notwithstanding a remit previously granted in his favor. Rae answered the Faculty's allegations, defending his qualifications and right to admission against their opposition.AI-generated
Documents in this case (4)
- Faculty of Advocates v. Rae — MemorialMemorial of the Dean and Faculty of Advocates, arguing that Mr William Rae should not be admitted to the Faculty on Trial, despite a remit having been granted.
- Faculty of Advocates v. Rae — Note, 8 Mar 1832March 8, 1832 Other by William Rae, asking the Court to hold the 1828 cessio interlocutor as a full absolvitor from all charges
- William Rae v. Dean and Faculty of Advocates — Answers, 31 May 1832May 31, 1832 Answers by William Rae to the Memorial and Report of the Dean and Faculty of Advocates, responding to allegations concerning his admission to the Office of Advocate.
- William Rae v. The Dean and Faculty of Advocates — Note, 7 Jun 1832June 7, 1832 Note of William Rae, asking the Court to authorise counsel to sign his answers to the memorial and report of the Dean and Faculty of Advocates
People & places in this case
People involved
- Sir William Rae, of St. Catherine Bart. — Party
- Robert Dickson — Party
- Robert Whigham, of Lochpatrick — Party
- David Dickson, of Hartree — Party
- John Hope — Advocate for Party
- Andrew Skene — Advocate for Party
- William Lang — Advocate for Party
- Cornelius Elliot, W.S. — Advocate for Party
- Adam Gillies, of Kintrochat, Lord Gillies — Lord Ordinary
- George Fergusson, of Hermand, Lord Hermand — Lord Ordinary
