◱ This document was identified in the bound volume Vol 282 164 175. It is published as found — its association with a specific case is still being established by our catalogers.
Date
Type
Answers
Length
6 pages
Repository
Centre for Research Collections, University of Edinburgh
Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by James Bennet, Robert Wilson, and John Burns to the petition of Duncan Wright, asserting that the slate work was not defective and requesting inspection by skilled slaters.

View larger map →

Appendix

  • Replies for Duncan Wright, Petitioner, to the Answers for James Bennet, Respondent (p. 2).
  • Interlocutor of the Sheriff, 3d November 1825 (p. 3).
  • Report by James Greig and James Kay, Slaters in Hamilton, dated Whiteshaw, 4th November 1825 (p. 3).
  • Interlocutor, 11th November 1825 (p. 4).
  • Defences for Sir James Steuart Denham, Bart, to the Summons of Forthcoming, Duncan Wright against James Bennet (p. 4-5).
  • Compearance for John Burns of East Machan in the Action of Forthcoming at the instance of Duncan Wright v. Sir James Steuart (p. 5).
  • Interlocutor of the Sheriff-Substitute in the conjoined Actions, 21st March 1828 (p. 5-6).

Subjects

Places mentioned