1795
HeritorTailzieAdjudicationInterlocutorNon-EntryRentDumfries, as heir to his mother and petitioner, sought to alter an interlocutor of December 1792 that had permitted the transference of an action of non-entry against him. Campbell responded that a declarator of nonentry commenced against the mother could be transferred in statu quo against her son and heir without requiring that he first take a passive title.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Dumfries v. Campbell — Petition, 15 May 1795May 15, 1795 Petition of the petitioner, asking the Court to alter the interlocutor of December 6, 1792, which permitted a transference of an action of non-entry against him.
- Dugald John Campbell of Skerrington and Charles Maxwell v. Patrick Earl of Dumfries — Answers, 5 Jun 1795June 5, 1795 Information of the respondent, arguing that a process of declarator of nonentry commenced against the petitioner's mother may be transferred in statu quo against him, her son and heir, without requiring a p…
People & places in this case
People involved
- John Campbell, Lord Stonefield — Party
- Charles Ross — Advocate for Party
