Carmichael v. Bannerman

Unto the Right Honourable, the Lords of Council and Session, Commissioners for Plantation of Kirks and Valuation of Teinds, the Petition of Sir Alexander Muir Mackenzie, Baronet, and David Kinloch of Gourdie, Esq; Heritors of the Parish of Lethindy; and of James Farqharson of Invercauld, Esq; Patrick Camppbell of Achalader, Esq; Laurence Balir Oliphant of Gask, Esq; and Thomas Hog of Wester Kinloch, Esq; Heritors of the Parish of Kinloch, and of the Officers of State for His Majesty's Interest

Answers for Colonel Bannerman of Lethindy, and James Scott of Balcairn, Pursuers; in the Process of Annexation of Parishes of Lethindy and Kinloch, with concurrence of the Officers of State, the Patronage of both Parishes being vested in the Crown, and with the approbation of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland, and Presbytery of the bounds, to the Petition of Sir Alexander Muir Mackenzie, Baronet, and Others

Unto the Right Honourable The Lords of Council and Session, the Petition of the Reverend John Carmichael, Presentee to the Parish of Kinloch

Unto the Right Honourable The Lords of Council and Session, the Additional Petition of The Rev. John Carmichael, Presentee to the Parish of Kinloch

Answers for Colonel Bannerman of Lethindy, and James Scott of Baleairn; to the Petition and Additional Petition of the Reverend John Carmicael, designing himself Presentee to the Parish of Kinloch

Unto the Right Honourable The Lords of Council and Session, Commissioners for Plantation of Kirks, c. the Petition of the Rev. John Carmichael, Presentee to the parish of Kinloch, in the county of Perth

Answers for Colonel Bannerman of Lethindy, and James Scott of Balcairn; to the Petition of the Reverend John Carmichael, designing himself Presentee to  the Parish of Kinloch, in the County of Perth