Archibald McHarg was the ordinary doer of James McHarg of Keirs. When he died, in July 1774, two bills from McHarg of Keirs were in his possession. One, for £230 sterling, was unendorsed and had been accepted by James McHarg in Tairly. The other was for £264 sterling. McHarg of Keirs argued that it was self-evident that Archibald McHarg had held both of these bills in trust: the first to recover payment, the second as a fund of credit. Keirs petitioned the Court to compel the heirs of Archibald McHarg to either deliver these bills to him or destroy them. The defenders, James McHarg, eldest son of Archibald, and his curators, argued that as these bills had been found in the possession of Archibald McHarg, the burden of proof of possession lay on McHarg of Keirs. Lord Monboddo found that the bills had been put into McHarg's hands by Keirs. The defenders gave representation, and then petitioned the Court to review Monboddo's interlocutors. According to marginalia on the case documents, the Court adhered.
Documents in this case (2)
- Macharg and Others v. Macharg and his Curators — Petition, 18 Dec 1776December 18, 1776 petition of James M'Harg asking the Court to alter Lord Monboddo's interlocutor and find the bills in question as value and not trust.
- James M'Harg of Keirs v. James M'Harg, eldest Son and Heir of the ... — Answers, 24 Dec 1776December 24, 1776 answers of M'Harg of Keirs to M'Harg's petition
People & places in this case
People involved
- James McHarg — Defender
- James McHarg, of Keirs — Pursuer
- William Macilwrath, Younger of Kirkland — Trustee/Tutor/Representative for Pursuer
- Andrew Blane, of Blanefield — Trustee/Tutor/Representative for Pursuer
- George Fergusson, of Hermand, Lord Hermand — Advocate for Pursuer
- William Craig, Lord Craig — Advocate for Defender
- James Burnett, Lord Monboddo — Lord Ordinary
- Archibald McHarg — Named in case documents
- James McHarg — Named in case documents
- George Tod — Named in case documents
Places
- Edinburgh (principal)
Where this case took place
Archibald McHarg was the ordinary doer of James McHarg of Keirs. When he died, in July 1774, two bills from McHarg of Keirs were in his possession. One, for £230 sterling, was unendorsed and had been accepted by James McHarg in Tairly. The other was for £264 sterling. McHarg of Keirs argued that it was self-evident that Archibald McHarg had held both of these bills in trust: the first to recover payment, the second as a fund of credit. Keirs petitioned the Court to compel the heirs of Archibald McHarg to either deliver these bills to him or destroy them. The defenders, James McHarg, eldest son of Archibald, and his curators, argued that as these bills had been found in the possession of Archibald McHarg, the burden of proof of possession lay on McHarg of Keirs. Lord Monboddo found that the bills had been put into McHarg's hands by Keirs. The defenders gave representation, and then petitioned the Court to review Monboddo's interlocutors. According to marginalia on the case documents, the Court adhered.