1792–1793
DebtCessio BonorumPropertyTrustBankruptcyArrestmentDavid Doig petitioned the Court to alter its recent interlocutor concerning repayment of a debt. Janet Macdonald and John Duff defended against the petition, asserting that their antenuptial contract validly excluded Duff’s creditors from her property.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Macdonald and Duff v. Doig — Petition, 15 Dec 1792December 15, 1792 Petition of David Doig, spirit-dealer in Pleasance of Edinburgh, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
- Janet M'Donald and John Duff v. David Doeg — Answers, 8 Jan 1793Janet M'Donald and John Duff defend against David Doeg’s petition for repayment of a debt, asserting the validity of their antenuptial contract that excludes Duff’s creditors from her property.
People & places in this case
People involved
- John Dickson, of Kilbucho — Party
- Alexander Young, W.S., of Harburn — Advocate for Party
- John Orr — Advocate for Party
- Charles Hope, Lord Granton — Advocate for Party
- John MacLaurin, Lord Dreghorn — Lord Ordinary
- Sir James Fergusson, of Kilkerran, Lord Kilkerran — Lord Ordinary
Places
- Edinburgh (principal)
